What Happened to Representative Government?
![]() |
Photo credit: www.loftonspace.com |
Our Founding Fathers knew that man was fallible and that
trusting too much power in a single person or entity within the government
would be disastrous to freedom and liberty.
When they designed the Legislative Branch of government, they created a
Senate and a House of Representatives.
The House was (and still is) elected by popular vote. That is, the people elected them. Senators were elected by state
legislatures. The intent of our Founding
Fathers was to ensure that both houses wouldn’t be pressured by the
populace. The Senate, free from this
pressure, could be an objective body that could focus on the business that had
to be done by the federal government.
(Wouldn’t it be nice if they could do that now?) So basically, the Senate looked after the
state interests and maintain a solid link between the states and the federal
government, thereby limiting the federal government’s power and preventing over
reach. The House represented the people’s
interests. Together, the Founding
Fathers believed the federal government would operate under the best
conditions.
However, as the country grew, so did hostilities within each
state. Political deadlocks ended with
vacant Senate seats. Those vacancies
sometimes lasted years. Even when there
weren’t deadlocks, there was a fair amount of bribery and intimidation at the
state level. So even at the state level,
the process wasn’t exactly perfect. To
fix this, the 17th amendment was proposed. This amendment did two major things: 1)
allowed Senators to be elected by popular vote, and 2) allowed the Governor of
each state to fill vacancies when they occur until a special election could be
held.
While this amendment eliminated lengthy Senatorial vacancies,
the unintended consequences have become clear: special interest groups and
individuals with agendas have more influence and power on Senators (and Representatives,
too, for that matter) than the people do.
This was NEVER the intent of the Founding Fathers. These interests provide a large amount of
money to election campaigns, and these “donations” always come with strings
attached.
This influence is why we no longer have a true
representative form of government.
Senate and House campaigns now spend a large amount of money. Many representatives have personal wealth
listed in the millions. Senators and
Congressmen have made careers out of political office. Neither of these was the intent of the
Founding Fathers. They envisioned the “citizen
legislator” – one who comes from the citizenry, not special interests and who did
not stay forever. This is another sure
way to create a condition in which greed, avarice, and corruption can flourish.
Term limits were put in place for the Office of President to
ensure a President never became so powerful that he/she could override the
other two branches of government.
Similar efforts to impose term limits on Congress have failed, the main
argument being that the popular vote imposes its own term limits; if the
representative failed to do his/her job, the people would vote them out. Unfortunately, with all this money flooding
elections, it’s difficult for the people to really tell what’s going on
sometimes, even the informed voter.
Rich, powerful, and influential representatives have the ability to “crush”
their competition, mainly because of all the money that’s available. Newcomers in particular have a very difficult
time against incumbents.
So, what do we do about this? I propose we repeal Section 1, Article 3, of
the 17th amendment and replace it with the original text, “The Senate of the
United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the
legislature thereof for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote” and
keep the language that provides for Governors to fill vacancies temporarily as
they occur.
It’s time we the people took back our federal
government. It’s time we the people
demanded accountability from our representatives. It’s time our representatives did what they
are elected to do; represent us. But I’m
no political/governmental scientist.
This is just my two cents – for what it’s worth.
Comments
Post a Comment